ASUS G75V: Ivy Bridge in 3D

ASUS G75V: Ivy Bridge in 3D

The ultimate gaming machines, such as Alienware or ASUS G-series, have always provoked amazement among gaming-oriented notebook amateurs. Top-notch gaming systems packed in a relatively small casing...

The winning combo: Z77 and Ivy Bridge

The winning combo: Z77 and Ivy Bridge

We’ve recently presented you with three different motherboard models based on the latest Intel Z77 Express chipset, however, we weren’t able to perform thorough testing as usual, as we didn’t have a...

OCZ ZT 650W: More powerful than it looks

OCZ ZT 650W: More powerful than it looks

Although the market is pretty saturated as far as PSUs are concerned, with all segments well-covered, manufacturers are still churning out new models in the desire to satisfy the customers’ needs as...

HTC One X: Prodigy HTC

HTC One X: Prodigy HTC

Up until a year ago, the top-class smartphone signed by HTC was Sensation, with a dual-core CPU at 1.2 GHz and 768 MB RAM. In this moment, however, that would be HTC One X with a quad-core CPU at 1....

Toshiba Portege Z830: Lighter than air

Toshiba Portege Z830: Lighter than air

Ultrabooks may still be in the takeoff phase, but one thing is for sure – they’ll be getting more and more popular, and companies have the utmost belief in their market success at the end of the day...

Extra large sensation

Extra large sensation

The trend of increased smartphone display dimensions is still going on, making all manufacturers experiment further with all sorts of diagonals, trying to determine which one is ideal, while maintai...

Home - Reviews - Cooling - Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO and TX3 EVO
Article Index

 

thumbAs far as accessible coolers of decent performance go, we’ve been enjoying the company of Cooler Master’s Hyper 212 and Hyper TX3 models for a while now. The first mild redesign of both these models happened two years ago, with Cooler Master opting for the same, well-balanced cooling bodies, but this time, with heatpipes lying directly on the CPU. It seemed as if Cooler Master had done all they could about the models at hand, perfecting them as much as possible, but the most recent additions to the family, with the EVO suffix, are there to prove us wrong.

Differences?

Other than the mentioned CDC, fans are the really major change on these models, as well as their mounting system. But before that, let’s briefly recollect what the bundle contains.
First and foremost, there’s the detailed and streamlined localised manual. In the case of Hyper 212 EVO, there’s still the universal upper clip, as well as the universal back one, which we already proclaimed a true masterpiece of design, as it fits seamlessly to both AMD’s and Intel’s CPUs. Hyper TX3 EVO still uses the clip-based system similar to that seen on Intel’s box coolers.

hyper212 evo 1 s

Of course, this only applies to Intel’s systems, while an AMD CPU would require the familiar lever-based approach. In short, doing something wrong while mounting these coolers is an exceptionally difficult task. The cooling bodies have remained unchanged. Hyper 212 EVO still has 47 aluminium fins surrounding four heatpipes with a diameter of 6 mm.

hyper212 evo 3 s

Just like the case with its predecessor, the fins stick firmly to the heatpipes in order to ensure maximum performance. Hyper TX3 EVO also reminds of its predecessor for the most part, which means that Cooler Master has kept 42 aluminium fins around three 6 mm-thick heatpipes. The base hasn’t been polished to the point of having a mirror effect on either cooler, but it’s very flat nevertheless, mostly because of the CDC technology being implemented.

tx3 evo 1 s


The new fan introduced by EVO models is of noticeably higher quality than the previous one, and similar to the one already seen on Cooler Master’s Hyper 612S. Hyper 212 EVO comes with a 120 mm fan, while Hyper TX3 EVO has a 92 mm one. The larger fan has an RPM range of 600-1600, while the smaller one works at 800-2200.

tx3 evo 3 s

The 120 mm-model literally can’t be heard from a distance of one meter when working at 700 RPM, but remains almost unnoticeable even at 1200 RPM. The noise generated from minimum to maximum RPM falls in the 9-13 dBA range. The 92 mm-fan generates somewhat more, between 17 and 30 dBA. The cable length of both is 30 cm.

tx3 evo 4 s


As already stated, other than the CDC and a redesigned DC, the only difference is the mounting system already seen on Hyper 612S. Fans are now mounted to the cooling body via plastic holders that need to be screwed into the fans, and then simply placed on the cooling body, gently press against it, and wait for the click to sound. Simple and efficient. Besides that, these plastic holders have clearly defined spots for the supplied rubber bumpers to be installed at if needed.

tx3 evo 2 s

You’ve guessed it, this reduces or completely eliminates any vibrations created by the fan that would end up transferred to the cooling body, and all this in order to ensure quiet operation of both Hyper TX3 EVO and Hyper 212 EVO.