|
Written by Marko Nesovic
|
|
Thursday, 04 March 2010 |
  Almost six months have passed since we first presented Athlon II quad-core CPUs on our site. In parallel with the 630 model, the cheapest 620 model was presented as well, threatening the competition severely with its price of under 100€ and bringing quad-core Phenom II derivatives closer to the mainstream segment. The popularity of these processors became evident quick after they were presented, and now we have the chance to review the latest member of the Athlon II X4 family, namely 635.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Ivan Todorovic
|
|
Wednesday, 10 February 2010 |
  A year and a half ago, Intel presented the market with its new and, as we were to see, rather significant processor oriented towards mobile devices. The CPUs codenamed Silverthorne, for the so-called mobile internet devices (MIDs), and Diamondville, for the ultra-portable PCs, miniature notebooks and nettops, were another step off the beaten path in Intel’s CPU development. Just like the company parted ways with the failures from the era of Pentium 4 with the Core 2 architecture, they made a few interesting moves in Atom development as well.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Marko Nesovic
|
|
Thursday, 04 February 2010 |
 Although autumn was pretty much coloured in AMD colours, due to the presentation of the new generation of Athlon II processors, first the X4, then the triple-core models, the folks at AMD didn’t rest on their laurels, allowing us to rejoice because of the latest and fastest member of the Athlon II X3 family, namely 440.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Marko Nesovic
|
|
Monday, 01 February 2010 |
 Intel continues the tradition of releasing of weaker models of their current CPU generation right after a serie of the most representative models, so now we finally have Core i3, the weakest but the most attractive CPU of the Nehalem architecture. As before, when after a serie of expensive Core 2 processors, we got a serie of weakened models for the masses, now we have the latest derivatives which differ significantly from the strongest i7 series, but are perfect for most needs of an average customer.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Djordje Kovacevic
|
|
Tuesday, 15 December 2009 |
  In the past few months, it became possible to purchase very good CPU for relatively small amount of money. Of course, those CPUs belong to, so-called, mid-range that will satisfy most users. We decided to compare performances of four CPUs with price tags around 60€ (90$). We tested them in games, rendering, archiving, photo editing and at the end, took a good look at their virtualization performances.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Fedja Drndarski
|
|
Friday, 23 October 2009 |
  Although AMD with its Phenom II CPU models cannot compete with competitors in form of Core i7 when it comes to top-performance models, Phenom II and its derivates can offer a lot of bang for the buck. AMD simply does not have high-end CPU that can be measured up against Core i7, but the rest of the lineup is very good. It is obvious that AMD aims at products that have best price/performances ratio. Phenom II is great gaming CPU and slightly inferior when it comes to workstation performance levels. On the other side, statistics are merciless and, retail-selling figures of those high-end CPUs are as low as just few percents compared to sum of all sold CPUs on the market today.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>
|
| Results 1 - 10 of 30 |
Processors 
